Teaching the framework hypothesis to youth

Does the Figurative 24-Hour view lead to overly figurative interpretations of the historical accounts of Genesis?


8/12/01

Christian Renewal
P.O. Box 770
Lewiston, NY 14092

Dear Editor:

In the July 2001 issue of Christian Renewal, Bill Pols challenged those of us who interpret the six days of creation in terms of a literary framework to present our position clearly enough to be understood by a child. In teaching this view to a church youth group, I found that even teens in middle school can understand the distinction between the use of figurative and literal language in the Scriptures and thus can grasp a figurative interpretation of the days of creation. First, I pointed out that the Bible has two kinds of truth: literal truth (true in an exact sense of the words) and symbolic truth (true in what the words picture). When I asked them whether particular passages were literal or symbolic, they had no trouble in classifying John 6:54, John 10:9, and Psalm 19:4-6 as symbolic and 1 Corinthians 15:3-5 and Isaiah 40:28 ("God...never faints nor is weary") as literal. Next, we read "In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day he rested and was refreshed" (Exodus 31:17). I asked, "Does this mean God got tired and had to rest on the seventh day?" Of course, they realized that God could not literally be refreshed. Then I asked, "Does this mean it took a literal six days for God to make everything?" The youth understood that the six days of work could be viewed as symbolic truth, just as the day of rest is. If I had more time, I could have asked them to find the similarities between days 1 and 4, between days 2 and 5, and between days 3 and 6. Then I could have asked, "since the light was created on the first day, but the sun and stars that gave the light were not created until the fourth day, do you think the order of the days is literal truth or symbolic truth?"

Mr. Pols asked, "How can the creation days be treated as non-literal without at the same time undermining one's commitment to the authority and clarity of Scripture?" In other words, would the principles of interpretation that yield a figurative interpretation of the days of creation also lead to a figurative interpretation of the rest of Scripture if they are applied consistently? If the first part of Genesis is figurative, then why not interpret the rest of Genesis figuratively? The answer is in the structure of Genesis: it is organized as a prologue with the creation days (1:1-2:3) followed by ten historical accounts, each of which begins with "This is the history/genealogy of" (2:4; 5:1; 6:9; 10:1; 11:10; 11:27; 25:12; 25:19; 36:1; 37:2). These ten parts are in the form of a historical narrative and are thus subject to a more literal interpretation than the highly stylized prologue. Therefore, for example, a figurative reading of the days of creation (1:1-2:3) has no bearing on whether the "history of the heavens and the earth" (2:4-4:26) or the "history of Noah" (6:9-9:29) should be taken figuratively.

I am a member of the First Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church of Augusta.

Sincerely,

David R. Bickel, PhD

[DawningRealm.org has a simple introduction to three interpretations of the days of creation. For a scholarly presentation of the Framework Hypothesis, see Meredith G. Kline. See David Roth for a Redemptive-Historical interpretation of Genesis 1:1-2:3.]

Bookmark and Share

Gloria Patri

Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Ghost; as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.

About this site

Dawning Realm proclaims the good news of the kingdom as confessed at Caesarea Philippi, Nicaea, and Augsburg.
This cross symbol, when appearing to the left of a topic, designates a category in Theology of the Cross, a directory of Lutheran articles.
Last modified: January 16, 2016 9:25 AM
Author information. David Bickel confesses the Nicene Creed, the Athanasian Creed, the Augsburg Confession, and the other documents of the Book of Concord because they faithfully summarize the sacred writings of the prophets and apostles. As a layman, he lacks the call needed to publicly teach in the church. | professional web page

Display troubleshooting

Browser-specific help. Internet Explorer users might need to maximize the browser window. Windows users may correct the overlapping of sections by clicking the Refresh/Reload button or by pressing control-R. Safari omits white space before headings. Frames, such as those of the home worship page, cannot be resized with 2006 versions of Opera and Firefox. Opera sometimes goes to the top of a page rather than to the position specified by the link.

Copyright and permissions

Copyright © 2001-2016 by David R. Bickel. No part of this web page may be displayed on the Internet, copied to another web page, or transferred electronically. Permission is hereby granted to print and distribute, for non-commercial purposes, hard copies (paper copies) of the content of this page without changes. Any other copying or distribution requires prior written consent.
Artwork. The "Christ Pantocrator—Cefalu, Sicily" background photo, taken by Michael Wilson ("Xerones"), is displayed according to its Creative Commons license. The photo of lightning at dawn ("Morning Lightning Storm"), taken by Jeff Kramer, is likewise displayed according to its Creative Commons license.
Scripture translations. Copyright information

<<< Dawning Realm: The enfleshed God's triumph over death and hell